Organizational behavior model as a predictor of job performance in educational quality management in university collaborators in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18050/psiquemag.v14i1.3283Keywords:
Work performance, quality management, university educationAbstract
Quality education has been outlined as a topic of global interest through the fourth sustianable developmen goal, whisch seeks to promote inclusive lifelong learning; its achievement requires integrated efforts of the educational institutions staff. This cross-sectional predictive research analyzes the predictors that improve the job performance of the university educational quality manager. We worked with a sample of 217 full-time teaching and administrative workers from a private Peruvian university. The instruments were the Positive Organizational Behavior Scale and the Quality Management Performance Scale. The results obtained with multinomial logistic regression analysis, showed a statistically significant effct on five of the eight predictors. Positive Beta coefficients were obtained for meaningful work (β = 1.66), horizontal collectivism (β = 1.16) and self-efficacy (β = 1.10) and negative ones for dispositional optimism (β = -1.63) and synergy (β = -1.56). It is concluded that job performance in quality management will improve if the first three predictors are strengthened and the last two are reduced in university professors and administrators in Peru.
Downloads
References
Abu-Jarour, S. F. (2013). Quality Management Practices and their Impact on Organization Performance. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 2(6), 1-10. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfmabstract_id=2711623&__cf_chl_captcha_ tk__=.d9Yo.7l2hb7NOW0kmB6WF7FKXg1sJj8GJ sUNnTHBS8-1641403087-0-gaNycGzNDxE
Aman-Ullah, A., Mehmood, W., Amin, S., Abbas Y. A. (2022). Human Capital and organizational performance: A moderation study through innovative leadership [Capital humano y desempeño organizacional: Un estudio de moderación a través del liderazgo innovador]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100261
American Psychological Association. (2017).Ethical principles of Psychologists and code of conduct [Principios éticos de los psicólogos y código de conducta]. https://www.apa.org/ ethics/code/index
Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en Psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/ analesps.29.3.178511
Azanza, G., Domínguez, A. J., Moriano, J. A., Molero, F. J. (2014). Capital psicológico positivo. Validación del cuestionario PCQ en España. Anales de la Psicología, 30, 294-301. http://dx.doi. org/10.6018/analesps.30.1.153631
Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF [El inventario de flow relacionado con el trabajo: Construcción y validación inicial del WOLF]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory if behavioral change [Autoeficacia: hacia una teoría unificadora del cambio de comportamiento]. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://educational-innovation.sydney. edu.au/news/pdfs/Bandura%201977.pdf
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism [Optimismo]. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 879-889. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006
Çetin, F. & Aşkun, D. (2018). The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsec work motivation [El efecto de la autoeficacia ocupacional en el desempeño laboral a través de la motivación laboral]. Management Research Review, 41(2), 186-201.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience [Flow: La psicología de la experiencia óptima]. Vearsa.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, European Students’ Union, European University Association, & European Association of Institutions in Higher Education. (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher ducation área(ESG) [Estándares y directrices para la garantía de calidad en el espacio Europeo de educación superior]. Bélgica. https://www.enqa.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf
Fabela-Cárdenas, M. A., y García-Treviño, A. H. (2014). Gestión de la calidad educativa en educación superior del sector privado. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 6(13), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.11144/ Javeriana.M6-13.GCEE
Hussain, T., y Younis, A. (2015). Quality management practices and organizational performance: Moderating role of leadership [Prácticas de gestión de calidad y desempeño organizacional: Rol moderador del liderazgo]. Science International Lahore, 27(1), 517- 522. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/287643462_Quality_Management_ Practices_and_Organizational_Performance_ Moderating_Role_of_Leadership
Kiran, V. S., Shanmugam, V., Raju, R. K., Kanagasabapathy, J. R. (2022). Impact of human capital management on organizational performance with the mediation effect of Human Resource Analytics [Impacto de la gestión del capital humano en el desempeño organizacional con el efecto mediador de la Analítica de Recursos Humanos]. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(3), 01-27. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022. v7i3.0667
Koopmans, L. Bernards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W., De Vet, H. C., &van der Beek, A. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance. A sistematic review [Marcos conceptuales del desempeño laboral individual. Una revisión sistemática]. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e318226a763
Koopmans, L.; Bernaards, C. M.; Hildebrandt, V. H.; de Vet, H. & van der Beek, A. (2013). Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators [Midiendo el desempeño laboral individual: Identificando y seleccionando indicadores]. A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 48(2), 229-238. DOI 10.3233/ WOR-131659
Lenihan, H., McGuirk, H., & Murphy, K. R. (2019). Driving innovation: Public policy and human capital [Impulsando la innovación: Política pública y capital humano]. Research Policy, 48, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.015
Llorens, S., Shaufeli, W., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? [¿Existe un espiral de ganancias positivas de recursos, creencias de eficacia y compromiso?] Computer in Human Behavior,23(1), 825-841. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and maintaining psychological strengths [Comportamiento organizacional positivo: Desarrollar y mantener fortalezas psicológicas].Academy of Management Executive, 16, 57-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ AME.2002.6640181
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance [El capital psicológico de los trabajadores chinos: Explorando la relación con el rendimiento]. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1740-8784.2005.00011.x
Mariz-Pérez, R. M., Teijeiro-Alvarez, M. M., & GarcíaAlvarez, M. T. (2012). The relevance of human capital as a driver for innovation [La relevancia del capital humano como motor de la innovación]. Cuadernos de Economía, 35(98), 68-72.
https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-cuadernoseconomia-329-pdf-X0210026612551071
Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y El Caribe. (2017). Educación 2030, Declaración de Buenos Aires, reunión regional de Ministros de Educación de América Latina y El Caribe. Argentina. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000247286
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct cleanup time [Comportamiento de ciudadanía organizacional:
Es hora de limpiar el constructo]. Human Performance, 10(2), 85– 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Organ, D. W. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior: Recent trends and developments [Comportamiento de ciudadanía organizacional: Tendencias recientes y desarrollos]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 295-306. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104536
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). World Education Forum 2015, final report [Foro Mundial sobre la Educación 2015]. Francia. https:// unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243724
Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects [Nuevas direcciones para la teoría de las organizaciones: Problemas y perspectivas]. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=LXY8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA42&hl=es&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rasit, Z. A., Satar, N. H. A., Ramli, A., & Hashim, M. (2018). Total Quality Management and organizational performance: The role of performance measurement system [Gestión de Calidad Total y desempeño organizacional: El papel del sistema de medición del desempeño]. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, 265-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.23004
Resolución Ministerial 233-2020-MINSA [Ministerio de Salud]. Que aprueba el documento técnico: Consideraciones Éticas para la Investigación en salud con seres humanos. 27 de abril de 2020. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/ uploads/document/file/662949/RM_233-2020- MINSA_Y_ANEXOS.PDF?v=1588082657
Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal synergies [Sinergias interpersonales]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00038
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017).Comportamiento organizacional. Pearson.
Schindler, L., Puls-Elvidge, S., Welzant, H., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of quality in higher education: A synthesis of the literature [Definiciones de calidad en la educación superior: Una síntesis de la literatura]. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 3-13. http:// dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together [Acción conjunta: Cuerpos y mentes moviéndose juntos]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70- 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
Seyfried, M., &, Pohlenz, P. (2018). Assessing quality assurance in higher education: Quality managers perceptions of effectiveness [Evaluación de la garantía de calidad en la educación superior: Percepciones de efectividad de los gerentes de calidad]. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235. 2018.1474777
Sistema de Evaluación Acreditación y Certificación de la Calidad Educativa. (2022). Reporte nacional N° 2: “Balance de la acreditación en el Perú, desafíos y recomendaciones de política”. Sistema de Evaluación Acreditación y Certificación de la Calidad Educativa. Perú. https://repositorio. sineace.gob.pe/repositorio/bitstream/ handle/20.500.12982/7163/Reporte%20 Nacional%202.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
Snyder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring and nurturing hope [Conecptualizar, medir y alimentar la esperanza]. Journal of COunseling & Development, 73(3), 355-360. https://doi. org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01764.x
Steger, M. F., Bryan, J. D., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI) [Midiendo el trabajo significativo: El inventario de trabajo significativo (WAMI)].Journal of Career Assessment,20(3), 322- 337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes [La medición psicológica de síndromes culturales]. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.407
Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality [Influencias culturales en la personalidad]. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.53.100901.135200
Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism and resiliencia [Comportamiento organizacional positivo en el lugar de trabajo: El impacto de la esperanza, el optimismo y la resiliencia]. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774-800. https://doi. org/10.1177/0149206307305562
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karla Azabache-Alvarado, Yoya Flores-Perez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.











