Social Conflict in Electoral Times, Perú 2021

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUcv-Scientia.v14n1a1

Keywords:

social problems; electoral campaign; electorate; public politics

Abstract

This work analyzes the electoral situation and the political, economic, social and health turbulence that Peru is going through in 2021 aggravated by the pandemic, it focuses on assessing the perception of voters regarding the management of governments in recent years, of the performance of political parties and electoral campaigns. The methodology used is quantitative research, non-experimental design and cross-sectional, collecting data through a questionnaire of 20 questions applied to a sample of 395 individuals between 18 to 65 years of age who live / settled in Peru in recent years. The results obtained in a general assessment of the categories are: 49.6% of the participants perceive poor management in the management of social problems in the last 10 years; 68.9% have a bad perception of the management of electoral campaigns and 79.0% perceive that political parties are regularly structured and organized. The conclusions determine a great dissatisfaction of the voters on the governmental management of the social problems, the bad perception in front of the polarization of the candidates and voters in full campaign, and the little representation / loyalty towards the semi-structured political parties.

References

Abbe, O. G., Goodliffe, J., Herrnson, P. S., & Patterson, K. D. (2003). Agenda Setting in Congressional Elections: The Impact of Issues and Campaigns on Voting Behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600404

Barrenechea, R., & Sosa, P. (2014). Perú 2013: La Paradoja de la Estabilidad. Revista de Ciencia Política, 267–292. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2014000100013

Batone, D. C. (2020). Mercado de trabalho em contexto de pobreza urbana: o caso da cidade de Lichinga, Moçambique.Labor market in the context of urban poverty: the case of the city of Lichinga, MoçambiqueMercado laboral en el contexto de la pobreza urbana: el caso de la ciudad. Espaço e Economia, 19. https://doi.org/10.4000/espacoeconomia.17258

Benoit, W. L. (2000). A functional analysis of political advertising across media, 1998. Communication Studies, 51(3), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970009388524

Boggess, L. N., & Hipp, J. R. (2014). The Spatial Dimensions of Gentrification and the Consequences for Neighborhood Crime. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 584–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.943799

Cárdenas, A., Ballesteros, C., & Jara, R. (2017). Redes sociales y campañas electorales en Iberoamérica. Un análisis comparativo de los casos de España, México y Chile. Cuadernos.Info, 41, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.41.1259

Carlin, R. E., Singer, M. M., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2015). The Latin American voter : pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts. The Unersity of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8402589

Carvalho, A. R. de, & Sousa, L. R. de. (2021). A evolução conceitual da desigualdade e da pobreza no pensamento econômico. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 41(2), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572021-3142

Dalton, R. J. (2011). Left-Right Orientations, Context, and Voting Choices. Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199599233.003.0005

Gaitán-Rossi, P., & Velázquez Guadarrama, C. (2021). Revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre mecanismos que vinculan crimen y pobreza. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28, 1. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v28i0.14685

Griffiths, E., & Tita, G. (2009). Homicide in and around public housing: Is public housing a hotbed, a magnet, or a generator of violence for the surrounding community? Social Problems, 56(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.474

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (Mc Graw Hill (ed.); Sexta Edic). 2014. https://www.uca.ac.cr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Investigacion.pd

Kaid, L. L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2006). Television Advertising and Democratic Systems Around the World. The SAGE Handbook of Political Advertising, September 2003, 445–458. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973403.n27

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Citizen–politician linkages: An introduction. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585869.001

Lachat, R. (2008). The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies, 27(4), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.002

Larreguy, H. A., Marshall, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2018). Leveling the playing field: How campaign advertising can help non-dominant parties. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(6), 1812–1849. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvy001

López-López, P.-C., & Oñate, P. (2019). De la videopolítica a la ciberpolítica: debate entre candidatos y televisiones en cinco elecciones presidenciales. El Profesional de La Información, 28(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.12

Meléndez, C., & Vergara, A. (2010). La Iniciación de la Política. In Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Paris, E. (2018). Penser la communication (Dominique Wolton). Réseaux, 15(84), 166–168. http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/reso_0751-7971_1997_num_15_84_3099

Ridout, T. N., Franz, M. M., & Fowler, E. F. (2015). Sponsorship, Disclosure, and Donors: Limiting the Impact of Outside Group Ads. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914563545

Sniderman, P. M., & Levendusky, M. S. (2009). An Institutional Theory of Political Choice. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, June, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0023

Sulmont, D. (2018). ¿Existe el voto programático en elecciones con un sistema de partidos políticos débil? Un análisis de las elecciones presidenciales peruanas de 2016. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 38(3), 429–457. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2018000300429

Tanaka, M. (2005). Democracia sin partidos Perú, 2000-2005 (Colección). Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

Van Steenburg, E. (2015). Areas of research in political advertising: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996194

Downloads

Published

2022-10-15

How to Cite

Vilchez Canchari, J. M. ., Elisa Quiñones, A., & Carhuachin Herrera, A. M. . (2022). Social Conflict in Electoral Times, Perú 2021. UCV-Scientia, 14(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.18050/RevUcv-Scientia.v14n1a1

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): Enero-Junio

Section

Research Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
 

Under the following terms:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.