La carta notarial como requisito indispensable en el delito de apropiación ilícita

Julio Iván  Rabanal Bardales; Gerardo  Ludeña Manco; Nilton Isaias Cueva Quezada

doi:10.18050/regunt.v3i1.06

Authors

Julio Iván Rabanal Bardales Universidad César Vallejo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-0652
Gerardo Ludeña Manco Universidad de Lima https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-9545
Nilton Isaias Cueva Quezada Universidad César Vallejo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-8884

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18050/regunt.v3i1.06

Abstract

Within the catalog of crimes against property in the Peruvian penal code we find the crime of illegal appropriation, the study of the present investigation had as objective to analyze the importance of the Notarial Letter as a documentary source of objective condition of punishability of the crime of illegal appropriation. The methodology was qualitative, original article and thematic analysis design. From the results, In Peru, the Supreme Court, has not been alien to this type of pronouncements, which support this form of resolution, since they have pronounced indicating that to determine the consummation of the crime and the request for return it is necessary to have the notarial letter (Cassation No. 428-2019-Arequipa, 2019). In this same line of thought, it is concluded that it has been instituted as a condition of prosecution that the notarial letter is an essential document for its determination. In practice, when a person files a complaint for this crime and does not attach the notarial letter requesting the return of the property, the complaint is filed in the tax offices.

References

Casación N° 428-2019-Arequipa, (2019). https://bit.ly/3L8SpNJ

Casación N° 473-2019-ICA, (2019). https://bit.ly/3ZBbPzn

Casación N° 301-2011-LAMBAYEQUE, (2012). https://bit.ly/3YCaZ3V

Damianovich De Cerredo, L. T. A. (2020). Delitos contra la propiedad (Editorial Universidad Rivadavia (ed.); 3ra. Ed.).

RAE. (2010). Diccionario. https://bit.ly/3yV4DSP

Ledezma Narvaez, M. (2009). Comentarios al Código Procesal Civil, análisis artículo por artículo, Tomo I (Gaceta Jurídica S.A. (ed.); 2da Ed.).

Peña Cabrera, A. (2016). Manual de derecho procesal penal (Instituto Pacífico S.A.C. (ed.); 4ta Ed.).

Reátegui, J. (2015). Manual de Derecho Penal Parte Especial – Delitos Contra la Vida, Contra el Patrimonio y otros. (I. P. S.A.C. (ed.); 1ra. Ed.).

Rojas, F. (2013). Los Delitos Contra El Patrimonio en la Jurisprudencia (Gaceta Jurídica S.A. (ed.); 1ra Ed.).

Rosas, J. (2013). Tratado de Derecho Procesal Penal: Análisis y desarrollo de las instituciones del Nuevo Código Procesal Penal (Instituto Pacífico S.A.C. (ed.); 1ra. Ed.).

RN N° 85-2017-Lima Norte, (2017). https://bit.ly/42iCind

Salinas, R. (2015). Delitos Contra El Patrimonio (Instituto Pacífico S.A.C (ed.); 1ra. Ed.).

San Martín, C. E. (1985). Las condiciones objetivas de punibilidad y su tratamiento procesal en el Perú. Derecho PUCP, 39, 355–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.198501.012

Staff Actualidad Civil. (2021). Código Civil & Procesal Civil (p. 01–1211). Pacífico Editores S.A.C.

Vizcardo, H. (2014). Estudio dogmático jurídico de los delitos patrimoniales de retención en el Código Penal Peruano. Docentia et Investigatio, 16(1), 57–84. https://bit.ly/3Ld3nlz