Ethics and principles in the management of judicial processes during the COVID 19 pandemic

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative research was to analyze ethics in the public sector from an outline of ethics and principles in the management of judicial processes during the COVID 19 pandemic. The article is framed within the inductive method of documented bibliographic review. No one can doubt the importance of the public function and its urgent demand for change. It is in this projection that the distortion in terms of the principles of speed versus efficiency of judicial processes is notorious; there has been innovation in virtuality and, however, the expectations of agility, rectitude and procedural guarantees expected by the justice system and the citizenship in favor of peace and justice have not been achieved, being perceptible the negative feeling that the Peruvian population has regarding an apparent malfunctioning of justice, where social discontent has repercussions from the magistrate up to the lawyer. It is certainly a structural and complex problem that makes it so difficult to change the pro-justiciable judicial system. The mere fact that the judicial system does not motivate and does not generate confidence in the defendant, who comes in good faith, is already a contradictory event. It is true that, right from the outset, there is a series of stereotypes and myths that must be confronted and prejudice has been impregnated in the collective memory of the citizens. In this context, this research is suggestive because it is a current issue.