Projects Rating for Business with Real Options Theory - Case ENERSUR S.A.

Authors

  • Joe Alexis González Vásquez Universidad César Vallejo, La Libertad, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18050/td.v12i1.695

Keywords:

Real Options Theory, Traditional Methods, Project Valuation, Option to defer, Option to abandon, Optionto expand, Optionto contract

Abstract

The present research aimed to use the approach of the Real Options Theory for Project Valuation and compare it with the Traditional Methods applied on the Enterprise ENERSUR Ltd. The premise which was considered forthe assessment of the project was generated on a basis of four options: deferring, abandoning, expanding, and contracting. For the option to defer, resultsreported that the time would be a year. The option to abandon depends on sales, liquidation or the closure of the project. The option to expand reports a growth of 30%, and the option to contract proposes to reassign idle facilities after 2.4 years. The Real Options Theory compared to traditional methodsfor Project Valuation demonstrated a greater effectivenessin decision-making, decisionsthat can be taken during the life of aninvestment project.

Published

2014-12-03

How to Cite

González Vásquez, J. A. . (2014). Projects Rating for Business with Real Options Theory - Case ENERSUR S.A. Tecnología &Amp; Desarrollo (Trujillo), 12(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.18050/td.v12i1.695

Issue

Section

Technology and Development

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.