Perception about the academic-assistance instruction in family medicine in Peru

Abstract

This was a descriptive research conducted to determine the perception about family medicine instruction at 12 universities in Peru. The sample consisted of 48 resident physicians of both sexes, aged between 26 and 45 years, using a structured survey. Results: 61.7% of the population under study was female, 69.6% between 26 and 35 years old, 60.9% was enrolled in the third year, 51.1% were studying at public universities; 31.9% selected the university because of its prestige, and the entrance procedure was 57.4% in first option. Regarding the clinical field, 61.7% qualified it as regular for academic training and 36.2% considered that it did not have adequate services in terms of food, rest, and sanitary facilities. Regarding the academic structure, 85.1% had curricula, 66% had syllables delivered on time and 51.1% referred to having the university virtual library service available. 72% referred to having a coordinator of the specialty, 43.4% had a supervisor in each rotation. 70.2% stated that the curriculum is partially met and 53.2% that the university did not have sister agreements for internships in family medicine. Although 96% perceived that family medicine is a priority for the country and that 2/3 of those surveyed considered that the selection of this specialty was appropriate, they also perceived that it did not have social recognition, that job opportunities were low, as well as that health authorities did not know the scope of this specialty. It was concluded that, although the academic structure had been improved, the health system still did not have the conditions or services required to attract future primary care physicians, facilitate their training, keep them motivated at the end of their specialization, and give them the opportunity to serve the community and their families.