Peer Review Process

The quality and rigor of the consigned works will be evaluated in the first instance by the Editorial Committee, who after verifying that the % of similarity in turnitin is not greater than 15%, will request the evaluation of specialist referees in the areas, otherwise the article will be returned in primary correction.

The arbitration system adopted for the journal is double-blind, made up of different specialists in the relevant areas, externally and anonymously. The evaluation of the manuscripts will be made according to criteria of: originality, social relevance, topicality, scientific rigor and compliance with editorial standards.

The final publication decision, after the evaluation process, may be: 1. Publication without modifications, 2. Publication with substantial modifications of form and content and 3. Not publishable

See >> Evaluation sheet