Social responsibility and scientific research in a private university in Lima, Peru

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18050/ucvs.v.13i1.01

Keywords:

Social responsibility, scientific research

Abstract

The article presents the results of the research related to the fulfillment of social responsibility (SR) in scientific research (CI) in the country. It assumes the Interpretative paradigm, Qualitative approach, Hermeneutical design. The sample was made up of five PhD students at a private university in Lima, all with a Master’s degree and involved in CI. The technique used was the interview and the instrument a semi-structured interview guide. The study meets criteria of credibility, auditability, transfer and confirmability of the data, which determines the scientificity of the work. The results determine that SR, in general terms, is not fully complied with in the country, mainly due to the capitalist interests of companies and institutions and profit-making purposes, which does not go beyond economic interests, so the population is unprotected in terms of its welfare. CI in the country as a generator of knowledge and seeking the benefit of society, is not being developed in light of the needs of today’s society; There is a minimal development, showing a classical academic training, to this is added that the research teachers who contribute to the training of postgraduate students do not have the deserved recognition and receive low remuneration. SR and CI are not profitably linked, nor is their transcendental importance for society evident. Although a certain relationship is glimpsed in ethics, very little research results are published in specialized journals and these publications are mostly of less impact. Regarding the role of the university, it is concluded that there is passivity in the development of CI with SR. SR planned in sustainable projects is reduced to a kind of assistance to the population, to specific efforts and not to the general management of contributing to the human development of society. It is urgent to promote sustainable plans that are really aimed at improving the conditions of the inhabitants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, M. (2004). La hermenéutica filosófica de Gadamer. Revista Electrónica Sinéctica, 1(24), 61-64. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/998/99815918009.pdf

Barth, M.; & Rieckmann, M. (2012). Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(26), 28-36. https://www.researchgate.net/journal/0959-6526_Journal_of_Cleaner_Production

Battaglia, M., Testa, L., Bianchi, L., Iraldo, F. y Frey, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and competitiveness within SMEs of the fashion industry: evidence from Italy and France. Sustainability, 6(2), 872-893. doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/su6020872. file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/sustainability-06-00872.pdf

Birindelli, G., Ferretti, P., Intoni, M. y Iannuzzi, A. (2015). On the drivers of corporate social responsibility in banks: evidence from an ethical rating model. Journal of Management & Governance, 109(3), 303-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9262-9. https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jmgtgv/v19y2015i2p303-340.html

Blanco, M. (2017). Estilos de aprendizaje y actitudes ante la investigación científica en estudiantes universitarios. Investigación & Desarrollo, 25(2), 82-99. Doi: http://dx.DOI.org/10.14482/indes.25.2.10960.

Cañete, R., Guilhem, D., Brito, K., Carvalho, M., Valdés, R. y Noda, A. (2014). Responsabilidad institucional y social en la investigación científica. Revista Cubana de Medicina, 53(1), 104-113.

Cervantes, L., Bermúdez, L. y Pulido, V. (2019). Situación de la investigación y su desarrollo en el Perú: reflejo del estado actual de la universidad peruana. Pensamiento y Gestión, 1(46), 1-13. http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=407848b6-0e0f-406e-be75-53563cb7d5cd%40sessionmgr103

Cuenya, L., y Ruetti, E. (2010). Controversias epistemológicas y metodológicas entre el paradigma cualitativo y cuantitativo en psicología. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 19 (2) 271- 277.

Cypher, J.M. y Dietz, J. (2014). The Process of Economic Development. (4° ed.). New York: Reutledge.

Duque, Y., Cardona, M. & Rendón, J. (2013). Responsabilidad Social Empresarial: Teorías, índices, estándares y certificaciones. Revista Cuadernos de Administración, 29(50), 196-206.

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. y Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

Fernández A, y Rivera C. (2016). Metodología para el perfeccionamiento de la gestión empresarial de cooperativas agropecuarias. Quito: Editorial de la Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE.

Flores, M., Rubio, G. Rodrad, M y Curvelo, J. (2017). Responsabilidad Social Universitaria. “Una aproximación desde la percepción de la colectividad académica”. Revista Científica Hermes 1(17), 80-103.

Gasca, E. y Olvera, J. (2011). Construir ciudadanía desde las universidades, responsabilidad social universitaria y desafíos ante el siglo XXI. Convergencia, 18(56), 37-58.

Lii, Y. y Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: when the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-0110948-0

Lichtenstein, D., Drumwright, M. y Braig, B. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726

Loli, R., Sandoval, M., Ramírez, E., Quiroz, M., Casquero, R. y Rivas, L. (2015). La enseñanza aprendizaje de la investigación. Representación social desde la perspectiva estudiantil. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina, 76(1), 47-56.

Olarte, D. y Ríos, L. (2015). Enfoques y estrategias de responsabilidad social implementadas en Instituciones de Educación Superior. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica de los últimos 10 años. Revista de la Educación Superior, 46(3), 19-40. ISSN: 2395-9037.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3a. ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Popkewitz, T. (1988). Paradigmas e ideología en la investigación educativa. Madrid: Mondadori.

Ramírez, M. y García, M. (2010). La alianza universidad-empresa-Estado: una estrategia para promover innovación. Revista EAN, 68, 112- 133.

Robbins, S., y Judge T. (2017). Organizational Behavior, (17° ed.). https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Robbins-Organizational-Behavior-Plus-2017-My-Lab-Management-with-Pearson-e-Text-Access-Card-Package-17th-Edition/PGM1810527.html

Rojas, M. y Espejo, R. (2020). La inversión en investigación científica como medida del capital intelectual en las instituciones de educación superior. Información Tecnológica, 31(1), 79-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000100079

Ruizalba, J., Vallespín, M. y González, J. (2014). El voluntariado corporativo y sus efectos sobre la satisfacción laboral y el compromiso en empresas familiares de Andalucía. Revista de Empresa Familiar, 4(1), 45-58.

Rusinko, C. (2010). Integrating sustainability in higher education: a generic matrix. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(3), 250-259.

Savelyeva, T. y McKenna, J. (2011). Campus sustainability: Emerging curricula models in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 55-66.

Sancho J., Creus, A. y Padilla, P. (2011). Docencia, investigación y gestión en la Universidad: una profesión tres mundos. Revista Praxis, 16(14), 17-34.

Terán, G., Montenegro, B., Bastidas, J., Realpe, I., Villarreal, F. y Fernández, A. (2017). Análisis crítico de la responsabilidad social en entidades de salud. Revista Cubana de Investigación Biomédica, 36(1), 1-8. Print version ISSN 0864-0300On-line version ISSN 1561-3011. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-03002017000100020&lng=en&tlng=en#?

UNESCO (1998). Conferencia mundial sobre educación superior en el siglo XXI Visión y Acción. http://www. unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_spa.htm

Vallaeys, F. (2006). El ethos oculto de la Universidad, en CD: Responsabilidad social universitaria. http://www.upch.edu.pe/rector/ durs/images/Biblio/HerramientasRSU/DiagnosticoEthosOcultoUniversitario/elethosocultodelauniversidad.pdf

Vallaeys, F. (2020). ¿Por qué la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial no es todavía transformadora? Una aclaración filosófica. Revista Andamios, 17(42), 309-333. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v17i42.745.File:///C:/Users/Usuario/Documents/ContentServer.pdf

Published

2021-11-26

How to Cite

Charry Aysanoa, J. M. ., Salinas Cruz, M. Ángela ., Saberbein Muñoz, C. ., & Prado Coronado, V. . (2021). Social responsibility and scientific research in a private university in Lima, Peru. UCV-Scientia, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.18050/ucvs.v.13i1.01

Issue

Section

Research Articles